APRA CPS 230 Example Evidence
The table below lists commonly evidenced control areas for CPS 230 and the artifacts that typically satisfy them; attach these to your controls as evidence.
| Control Area | Example Evidence |
|---|---|
| Board accountability | Board charter establishing the board's responsibility for operational risk, business continuity, and service provider oversight |
| Board oversight in practice | Board meeting minutes showing regular operational risk reporting and approval of tolerance levels, the business continuity plan, and the service provider management policy |
| Risk management framework | Framework documentation covering governance arrangements, the operational risk profile, control effectiveness, monitoring, business continuity, and service provider management |
| Risk assessment policy | Policy defining the assessment process and explicitly covering legal, regulatory, compliance, conduct, technology, data, and change management risks |
| Periodic risk assessment | Completed risk assessment or risk register spanning the full range of operational risks, with documentation of how new products, services, and technologies change the risk profile |
| Risk treatment | Remediation plans with named owners, actions, and target dates, plus tracking records showing material weaknesses stay on the risk profile until closed |
| Scenario and incident response testing | Test reports covering severe operational risk scenarios, with outcomes identifying new or amended controls |
| Business impact analysis | Analysis identifying critical operations under the CPS 230 definition, with written justification for any APRA-prescribed operation not classified as critical |
| Tolerance levels | Board-approved tolerance documentation per critical operation covering maximum tolerable outage, maximum data loss, and minimum service levels, plus monitoring reports against those tolerances |
| Business continuity plan | Approved plan containing the critical operations register, tolerance levels, activation triggers, resource arrangements, execution risks, dependencies, and a communications strategy |
| Business continuity and disaster recovery testing | Annual exercise report showing the scenarios tested, including service provider disruption, with recovery performance measured against tolerance levels |
| Australian Prudential Regulation Authority (APRA) notifications | Documented procedures for the 72-hour incident, 24-hour tolerance breach, and 20-business-day arrangement notifications, plus redacted copies of notifications actually sent |
| Service provider management policy | Approved policy covering identification of material service providers, entering, monitoring, and exiting arrangements, and fourth-party risk |
| Material service provider register | Register identifying material service providers, with executed agreements containing service levels, data ownership, audit and APRA access, liability, and termination provisions |
| Vendor due diligence | Completed due diligence for recently engaged or materially changed providers covering selection, ongoing capability, financial and non-financial risks, geographic concentration, and exit planning |
| Service provider changes | Change records and reassessments for material modifications to provider arrangements, with updated risk assessments and reporting to senior management |
| Independent assessment | Internal audit reports covering operational risk management, business continuity plan reviews, and outsourced critical operations, with reporting to the board |